Manejo quirúrgico de tumores en riñón en herradura. Revisión de la literatura y análisis de 2 casos

IntroductionThe horseshoe kidney is a rare congenital anomaly in the general population that combines renal ectopia, malrotation and abnormal vascular supply. The most frequently developed tumor in this case is renal cell carcinoma (50%).One of its main characteristics is great anatomical variation, especially in terms of vascular structures.Material and methodsWe present two cases of patients with diagnosis of renal tumor in horseshoe kidneys, both treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in our department. Additionally, we have carried a review of the current literature.DiscussionIndications for surgical treatment in this pathology are the same as in kidneys with normal anatomy. Traditionally, treatment has been open surgery, with heminephrectomy as surgery of choice. The current trend is to advocate nephron-sparing surgery, and the laparoscopic approach has been progressively gaining importance.ConclusionA thorough imaging study is essential for proper surgical planning.     

Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used.Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer.     

Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis

IntroductionMulticenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the ‘E’ domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed.Materials and methodsPatients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the ‘E’ domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery).ResultsOverall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement.ConclusionsOur findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.     

Health Care Professionals’ Assessment of Patient Discomfort After Abdominal Surgery

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to classify elements of patients' discomfort in the resuscitation room after open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery as per health care professionals’ perceptions.DesignA prospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Spain.MethodsResuscitation room nurses administered the Postoperative Discomfort Inventory to physicians and nurses with >1 year experience working closely with patients who had undergone abdominal surgery, asking them to score nine items related to patients' discomfort in the first 8 hours after surgery on an 11-point scale (0 = absent to 10 = very severe). Interobserver agreement among proxy reporters was measured with the Spearman's ρ; correlations >0.35 was considered adequate agreement.FindingsOf 125 eligible professionals, 116 (93%) participated (63 [54%] nurses and 53 [46%] physicians; mean age, 38 ± 12 years; 86 [74%] women). Professionals' perception of discomfort differed significantly between patients undergoing open surgery and those undergoing laparoscopic surgery; after open surgery, the most common types were pain (7.1 ± 1.8), movement restriction (7 ± 1.75), and dry mouth (6.6 ± 2.6), whereas after laparoscopic surgery, the most common types were dry mouth (5.85 ± 2.8), abdominal bloating (5.3 ± 2.5), and pain (5 ± 2.2). The Spearman's ρ correlations were inadequate for all items except for dry mouth in open surgery (r = 0.40).ConclusionsPain, movement restriction, abdominal bloating, and dry mouth were the main causes of discomfort. Our findings highlight the need to be vigilant for all manifestations of discomfort after abdominal surgery to enable timely treatment.     

Adult groin hernias

A groin hernia is a common presenting complaint for adults and surgical repair is usually recommended. Patients may present with swelling or pain in the groin and one should be cognisant of the surgical emergency of a strangulating or obstructing hernia. A careful history and examination will help determine differential diagnoses and with planning the potential approach for repair. Surgical techniques have developed in recent years with a swing towards favouring laparoscopy in the elective patient. For both open and laparoscopic approaches, there are recognized techniques to consider. It is crucial to have a clear understanding of the anatomy in order to develop the skills required for accurate dissection, reduction and repair. Complications, although rare, can lead to severe morbidity. Laparoscopy has the advantage of reducing postoperative chronic pain but requires greater skill and experience to perform successfully. This chapter outlines the key considerations and surgical techniques for groin hernia repair and should be used in conjunction with practical training.     

经脐单切口腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的临床护理

目的 总结经脐单切口腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的护理经验。方法 回顾分析2009年6月-2011年10月我院微创胆道外科施行的8例经脐单切口腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的资料,总结相关护理体会。结果 除1例因粘连严重,中转为多孔手术外,其余均行经脐单切口腹腔镜胰体尾切除术。住院6-9d;患者术后均无胰漏、出血及感染等并发症;术后3-7d拔除引流管,脐部切口愈合良好,无护理并发症。结论 做好经脐单切口腹腔镜胰体尾切除术病人的护理,及时消除术后不良反应,做好生活指导和护理,是手术成功的保证。     

经阴道与经腹腔镜行子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床效果比较

目的研究经阴道与经腹腔镜行子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床效果。方法选取2011年1月~2014年6月住院治疗的92例子宫肌瘤患者,分为对照组46例和观察组46例,对照组患者经腹腔镜行子宫肌瘤剔除术,观察组患者经阴道行子宫肌瘤剔除术,对比观察两组患者治疗的临床效果。结果观察组患者的临床治疗效果显著优于对照组,P0.05表示有显著性差异,具有统计学意义。结论经阴道行子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床效果确切,具有手术时间短、出血少,恢复快等优点。     

Vascular Management During Live Donor Nephrectomy: An Online Survey Among Transplant Surgeons

In 2006, a survey from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons disclosed significant and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events in live donor nephrectomies (LDN) related to failure of clips, leading to the contraindication of the Weck® Hem‐o‐lok® clip for control of the renal artery during LDN. A survey regarding vascular control techniques, their perceived safety ratings and their failures was sent to 645 European Society for Organ Transplantation members who profiled their profession as “surgeon” and selected “kidney” as organ type. Two hundred forty‐three (41%) members responded, of whom 171 (63.3%) independently perform LDN. Their responses were analyzed. For arterial and venous vascular control, the GIA? and TA?stapler are used most frequently, and were rated the safest. Of the 121 reported hemorrhagic events, slippage and dislodgement of clips occurred at least 58 times, while stapler malfunction occurred at least 40 times. One donor death from hemorrhage related to clip dysfunction was reported. Hemorrhagic complications of LDN with fatal and non‐fatal outcomes still occur. Strikingly, many surgeons do not use the vascular closing technique that they consider most safe. Failure of non‐transfixion techniques is associated with greater risks for the donor. Control of major vessels in LDN must employ transfixion techniques for optimal donor safety.